REDD Smart Solutions

Advertisement
The scheme pays the population of developing countries to curb carbon emissions from deforestation considered susceptible to leakage. Because the preservation of wood in one location followed by logging in anywhere else because people need wood for everyday life.

"Developed countries should be more clever in keeping the addition of carbon, send the money directly to residents," says Princeton University economist environment, Brendan Fisher. "Converting a patch of dirt followed by a flow of produce from elsewhere. This will be a serious threat to the welfare and livelihoods. "

Fisher and his team perform in-depth analysis on locations around the Eastern Arc Mountains of Tanzania which is a source of biodiversity in order to find out the progress of the program Reducing Emissions from Deforestation and Forest Degradation (REDD). Fisher's findings showed cessation of deforestation was a cause of loss for people who have been relying subsistence from forest products. Most analysts REDD + does not take into account this problem.

Fisher-Smart proposed REDD program that provides assistance to residents in order to utilize the resources they already have. Carbon payment of money set aside for the purchase of fertilizers, seeds, and agricultural extension services so that residents can increase crop yield, also the distribution of energy-saving stoves.

REDD schemes-Smart with an additional cost of forest monitoring would be more expensive than paying people not to use forest land, but the REDD-Smart is believed to prevent leaks that often occur in the previous scheme and on the other side of the food security of the population is also increasing.
Advertisement
REDD Smart Solutions | bekerja | 5

0 comments:

Post a Comment